Pkg-based base system.
Colin Percival
colin.percival at wadham.ox.ac.uk
Tue Mar 16 23:26:55 PST 2004
At 07:04 17/03/2004, Scott Long wrote:
>The trick here is to know when you start sliding too far down the
>slope. It's hard to argue about sendmail, named, gcc, etc, but where do
>you stop? Before long, you'll be chopping out nvi
One of the packages I created was freebsd-base-vi...
> for the people who
>favor vim, and so on.
... although I was actually thinking of people who use Emacs. :-)
> I'm actually more in favor of keeping FreeBSD as
>the 'reference implementation', and encouraging others to make
>derivatives off if it that satifies these kinds of needs. But we will
>see where things head. Above all, I support your work, but just ask you
>to be cautious and not this get carried away.
I wasn't even considering making any commits here; I just wanted to
throw out some code, point out that we really can split the base system
into a number of optional pieces, and see where discussion went. This
might be useful for a sysinstall replacement, for one thing.
Colin Percival
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list