I like SCHED_4BSD
Will Saxon
WillS at housing.ufl.edu
Thu Mar 11 11:32:40 PST 2004
> I couldn't agree more. After doing the suggested mappings in
> libmap.conf
> and recompiling apps I can see a drastic difference in load times and
> performance between ULE and 4BSD. Using ULE the load wait for firefox
> could be anywhere from 10-30 seconds while with 4BSD it is a
> constant 4
> second load time. When switching between desktops it can take
> up to 10
> seconds to redraw the screen. This sluggishness isn't exclusive to
> firefox, opera and openoffice are noticeably laggy under ULE
> as well. I
> WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there.
I am not experiencing this with firefox. It takes 2-3 seconds to load.
I am also not experiencing issues with screen redraws.
I am using a Feb 14th -current with _ULE. firefox-bin is linked against
libpthread.
Old, I know, but maybe it can help narrow down a timeframe where changes
have caused problems?
-Will
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list