On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > This assertion doesn't seem necessary. Apply to > src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c No, it's not necessary, but the only consumers of spinlocks are libc and we don't want libc calling locking functions when we're not threaded. It was an anti-foot-shooting thing I believe. -- Dan Eischen