Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C

[Michael Nottebrock]

On Monday 05 July 2004 04:02, Rob wrote:
> Colin Percival wrote:
> > At 08:12 04/07/2004, Joel Dahl wrote:
> >>1) Is there a need for a rewrite of cvsup and portupgrade in C so that
> >> they can be included in the base system?
> >
> > Yes please. :-)
>
> I remember that portupgrade is intentionally not in the base system, to
> allow easier updates for a running system. This way it can be more often
> updated than the official releases, to reflect changes in the ports system.

And that's a good thing. Perhaps somebody wants to investigate if some sort of 
packages-only, C based updater which does not need a local ports tree to work 
is feasible. That could very well have a place in the base-system and also 
further promote and ease the use of binary packages.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi at freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040705/3f08029b/attachment.bin