SCHED_ULE and nice still ignored
tom at sdf.com
Sat Jan 31 13:55:15 PST 2004
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> If I start a process with nice 15 (like seti) it shouldn't slow down my
> machine by exponetial factors.
> It should take cycles which are almost unused and not block regular processes
> (like make)
Isn't "idprio" the best way of scheduling a process to run when the
system is otherwise idle? Can you try with idprio?
From what I know of "nice", it should reduces the processes scheduling
priority. There is no definition in the nice manpage on the exact
definition of reduced priority means.
More information about the freebsd-current