Processes blocked on ufs or getblk
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Wed Jan 28 12:54:34 PST 2004
In message <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDE74 at EBE1.gc.nat>, "Robin P. Bl
anchard" writes:
>
>> >Given the lockedvnod message:
>> >Locked vnodes
>> >0xc7003378: tag ufs, type VREG, usecount 2, writecount 0,
>> refcount 1,
>> >flags (VV_OBJBUF), lock type ufs: EXCL (count 1) by thread
>> 0xc6066d20 (pid 81250)
>> > ino 2523831, on dev aacd0s1g (4, 26)
>> >
>> >Should I substitue aacd0s1g (disk+slice+part) for ad0 in your above
>> >example ? Or should I be using disk or disk+slice ?
>>
>> Just aacd0 should do.
>>
>
>Unfortunately, that didn't help...Thanks for the suggestion, though.
Ok, it worked for the ata problem sos@ just committed a fix for,
but obviously the aac related problem is something entirely different.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list