RFC: Weekly status update 17/01/04-23/01/04 (cvs-src summary)
PeterJeremy at optushome.com.au
Sat Jan 24 14:03:33 PST 2004
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:08:46AM -0600, Mark Johnston wrote:
>- Subject matter - too narrow? too broad? should I cover the -current
> list instead of cvs-src, or try to combine both into one report?
It would be nice to see a -current summary but I think it should be a
separate report and I'd be a bit concerned about burnout if you tried
to do both yourself. I'd start by producing the cvs-src report only
for a few months and see how things turn out.
>- Prose - too technical? not technical enough? too flowery? too plain?
Good - just right.
>- Commits covered - Did I miss anything I should have included, or
> include things I should have skipped?
I don't recall seeing any commits that should have been mentioned but
weren't and didn't see anything in the report that I felt should have
been left out.
>- Impartial? I've tried not to attribute consensus and opinions where
> they weren't very clear; have I succeeded?
I think the report was impartial
>- Interest - would you be interested in seeing something like this
> produced weekly?
Definitely. I think the report is an excellent idea.
More information about the freebsd-current