question on mergemaster
Eric Anderson
anderson at centtech.com
Mon Jan 19 11:16:31 PST 2004
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> The optimistic way to do this would be to have some sort of
>> switch to mergemaster to tell it to go into autoupdate mode,
>> and it will only ask for files that contain a "negative
>> magic" like: # mergemaster noautoreplace
>> In which case the administrator should put this string at
>> the beginning of every file that he tweaks in /etc
>
>
> This is probably easier to implement, but there is still a
> good chance that someone will make an important change to
> some /etc file, and:
> 1) not-know to add the line
> (documentation? Who reads documentation?)
> 2) know, but still forget to do it
> 3) remember to do it, but misspell the magic line.
>
> And at some future system update their change will be automatically
> and quietly erased. And depending on the change, they might not
> realize that it is gone until weeks or months after having made
> the mistake.
>
> I think it would be a mistake if we streamline mergemaster to
> the point that users can easily start losing updates.
I think you missed something - "some sort of switch to mergemaster to
tell it to go into autoupdate mode" - which I understood it to mean,
that the default action will not change, unless you use a "mergemaster
-I" or some such beast..
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
All generalizations are false, including this one.
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list