Status reports - why not regularly?

[Josef El-Rayes]

"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona at theatre.msu.edu> wrote:
> 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and 
> therefore dropped immediatally.  this sort of report is handled 
> wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate 
> what he has done
why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area
should be covered here too. 

-josef
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 479 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20040113/24facaf6/attachment.bin