Expensive timeout(9) function ?

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Doug White wrote:

> > what reports do you expect with the
> >
> > 	"Expensive timeout(9) function"
> >
> > message ? Why do we see it ?
>
> You compiled your kernel with 'options DIAGNOSTIC'. Unless you have an
> explicit reason for doing so, you should not use this option.

I do have.

Some people added the code for a special purpose I guess - most likely to
identify something ? So the question is what's the purpose and
if people who compile with DIAGNOSTIC and see it should they report it
and if so what should they report ?

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb				bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74				http://www.zabbadoz.net/