make vs. gmake in 6-CURRENT...
Chuck Swiger
cswiger at mac.com
Thu Dec 16 10:30:37 PST 2004
Hi, Ruslan, Harti, (and all):
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:18:33PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
>>However, it seems like that space-stuffing when generating paths would
>>break lots of other things. Anyway, I wanted to bring up the issue here
>>and ask whether this change to make's behavior is expected or whether it
>>should be considered a bug...?
>
> FWIW, I cannot reproduce this problem:
Did you comment out the "USE_GMAKE= YES" line? As I mentioned, a fix to the
port has already been applied, but you can see the problem reproduced on the
ports build cluster at this URL:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.6.2004121303/dvd+rw-tools-5.21.4.10.8.log
-----
Harti Brandt wrote:
[ ... ]
> I cannot reproduce this (I have not looked at the port's makefile). Can
> you make a small makefile that shows this behaviour?
Sure, I'll give it a shot. Try a "make install" against this:
# Makefile attempt to reproduce bug
BIN_FILES= foo bar baz
WRKSRC= /tmp
install:
.for i in ${BIN_FILES}
cp ${WRKSRC}/${i} /var/tmp/
.endfor
...and see whether 6's make space-stuffs "/tmp/foo" into "/tmp/ foo". If it
doesn't, the port's Makefile isn't much bigger than this example.
Thanks for the interest...
--
-Chuck
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list