cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd)
Tony Arcieri
tarcieri at atmos.colostate.edu
Wed Dec 15 13:01:22 PST 2004
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:32:14PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Scott Long wrote:
>
> I'm definitely not against these fixes going into RELENG_5, but I would
> > like to see some significant testing be applied to them in HEAD first,
> > especially to changes that are not confined to just sched_ule.c (and
> > sched_4bsd.c).
>
> Can I commit changes that are restricted to sched_ule.c? It certainly
> can't make things any worse than they are on RELENG_5 now. We can leave
> the #error in until it's really tested on head. That way only people who
> remove that line of code can use it.
The changes to kern_sig.c are also necessary to ensure the stability of
the ULE scheduler, correct? I guess I'll just keep running with a kernel
build with RELENG_5 sources and sched_ule.c, kern_switch.c, and
kern_sig.c from head.
And am I correct that the UMA implementation in RELENG_5 has rendered
proc_fini() obsolete and thus it won't ever be called?
Tony Arcieri
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list