[security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD
Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs]
Barney Wolff
barney at databus.com
Fri Oct 3 19:10:43 PDT 2003
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 06:54:04PM -0700, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:45:27PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> > I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain
> > the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person
> > following -current who doesn't build every day.
>
> Simply because the SO does not support -CURRENT.
Does this mean that the situation can ever arise where a security bug
is corrected in the advisory's announced releases but not in -current?
Or, can we assume that as of the time of the security announcement
the vulnerability has *always* been corrected in -current?
Thanks,
Barney
--
Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list