[security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD
Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs]
Barney Wolff
barney at databus.com
Fri Oct 3 18:45:29 PDT 2003
I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain
the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person
following -current who doesn't build every day.
This notable omission has been true of every security advisory I
can remember, and I've never understood it. If I'm missing some
logic that makes it the right thing to do, can somebody please
enlighten me?
Thanks,
Barney
----- Forwarded message from FreeBSD Security Advisories <security-advisories at freebsd.org> -----
VI. Correction details
The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was
corrected in FreeBSD.
Branch Revision
Path
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
RELENG_4
src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.c 1.3.2.9
src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.31.2.3
src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.4.2.4
src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.11.2.4
src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.10.2.4
src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_rlimit.c 1.5.2.1
src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_status.c 1.20.2.5
src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.11.2.2
RELENG_5_1
src/UPDATING 1.251.2.11
src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.50.2.11
src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.22.2.1
src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.28.2.1
src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.27.2.1
src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c 1.35.2.1
src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.74.2.1
src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.27.2.1
etc.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list