fuword(), suword(), etc.

[Shawn]

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 01:42, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I do know that even if they remove the bridge, they are unlikely
> to provide enough documentation to boot and run natively on the
> hardware without having IBM code setting up the bus arbitration
> and other bits that are currently undocumented.

Why would IBM try to hide this? Wouldn't they *want* people to take full
advantage of the processor for the best performance to help give their
product a good image?

-- 
Shawn <drevil at warpcore.org>
http://drevil.warpcore.org/