GDB - do we dare?
Marcel Moolenaar
marcel at xcllnt.net
Sun Jul 13 09:50:21 PDT 2003
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 05:57:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > A1 If having support for amd64 is a major reason for doing a new
> > import of GDB, importing the upcoming GDB 6.0 would make more sense
> > to me.
>
> No ia64 is the major reason :-)
>
> Hmm. I think I just crashed pluto1 trying to get it to run the GDB
> testsuite on a not-yet-fully-functional GDB port. Currently RSE is
> giving me some headaches.
Yeah, this is known (both the crashes and the headache :-) I was
working on that (the crashes), but now need to make ia64 functional
again. The gcc import left us dead in the water. Our crt1.c is
broken.
> > A2 I'm volunteering to help out here.
>
> Cool, thanks. Shall we just create a p4 branch and start hacking?
>
> Oh dear, do I need to learn another version control system?
Yes, preferrably. Using a p4 branch allows us to track the gdb 6
branch while we prepare for the import. It's a convenient place
for people to grab the WIP.
> > better on FreeBSD/i386 and FreeBSD/Alpha now. Now that I've got it
> > working on FreeBSD/amd64, I'll give FreeBSD/ia64 a shot.
>
> We probably need to talk then, because the ptrace interface needs
> to be fleshed out and I planned to do that while porting gdb.
>
> Probably. The current layout of `struct reg' and `struct fpreg' is a
> bit ... messy.
It is not. It is actually pretty neat. Incomplete maybe, but neat.
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel at xcllnt.net
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list