buildworld failure
Daniel C. Sobral
dcs at tcoip.com.br
Fri Aug 29 10:31:29 PDT 2003
Mike Jakubik wrote:
>
> I think the impact is more social. People will try to compile world and get
> failures. Specially people coming from the 4.x branch, where this sort of
> think never occurred. If this is the only thing preventing a clean makeworld
> with -O2, I think its worth taking a look at.
It is not true "this sort of thing" never occurred. We have never, ever,
supported anything above -O because it has always given trouble.
> I've been using freebsd since the 2.x days, I have always compiled world
> and ports with -O2, and never had any instability issues due to the
> optimizations. I have switched back to -O and -march=pentium4, the
> buildworld finished ok.
Lucky you. It does happen that these optimizations may result in code
with no apparent problem, depending on one's hardware, though I suspect
many people's "hardware problems" were nothing of the sort.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo at tco.net.br
Daniel.Sobral at tcoip.com.br
dcs at tcoip.com.br
Outros:
dcs at newsguy.com
dcs at freebsd.org
capo at notorious.bsdconspiracy.net
Not all men who drink are poets.
Some of us drink because we aren't poets.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list