From fsilvaleandro at gmail.com Mon Jun 1 05:24:14 2009 From: fsilvaleandro at gmail.com (Leandro F Silva) Date: Mon Jun 1 11:23:13 2009 Subject: Cluster in FreeBSD Message-ID: <28f938b10905312154t20292eccq65f487213beb59ab@mail.gmail.com> Hi guys.. I would like to know what cluster program do you use for cluster of processing and for cluster of availability .. Thanks .. From mandrei05 at gmail.com Mon Jun 1 14:57:37 2009 From: mandrei05 at gmail.com (Andrei Manescu) Date: Mon Jun 1 14:57:44 2009 Subject: freebsd-cluster Digest, Vol 122, Issue 1 In-Reply-To: <20090601120009.C5A5F10656A8@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20090601120009.C5A5F10656A8@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: Check the archives of this mailing list. 2009/6/1 > Send freebsd-cluster mailing list submissions to > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-cluster-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-cluster-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-cluster digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Cluster in FreeBSD (Leandro F Silva) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:54:06 -0300 > From: Leandro F Silva > Subject: Cluster in FreeBSD > To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > <28f938b10905312154t20292eccq65f487213beb59ab@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi guys.. > > I would like to know what cluster program do you use for cluster of > processing and for cluster of availability .. > > Thanks .. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > End of freebsd-cluster Digest, Vol 122, Issue 1 > *********************************************** > From reply at moneybookers.com Thu Jun 4 00:58:57 2009 From: reply at moneybookers.com (www.moneybookers.com) Date: Thu Jun 4 00:59:10 2009 Subject: Update Account. Message-ID: <20090604003424.D39FC2EB1864@h1603454.stratoserver.net> ********************************************************************** ******************** THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - . ********************************************************************** ******************** Dear Moneybookers Customer,: Due to concerns, for the safety and integrity of the Moneybookers.com account we have issued this warning message. It has come to our attention that your Moneybookers.com account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. Once you have updated your account records your Moneybookers.com account service will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. To update your Moneybookers.com records click on the following link: [1]http://Moneybookers.com/ Moneybookers Security Reminders Case Sensitive Login Please remember your password is case-sensitive, at least 6 characters long and contains at least one number or non-alphabetic character such as '-'. ******************************* Moneybookers Ltd., London, Registered in England and Wales no 4260907. Registered office: Welken House, 10-11 Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6EH, United Kingdom. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom (FSA). References 1. http://www.protocolinfogate.com/moneybookers/directory.php?app=login.pl From mgrant at grant.org Fri Jun 5 09:35:42 2009 From: mgrant at grant.org (Michael Grant) Date: Fri Jun 5 09:35:53 2009 Subject: bsdcluster.com/org Message-ID: <62b856460906050210q608b6d16n8cb4aadbf4ab4871@mail.gmail.com> I have the domain name bsdcluster.com and bsdcluster.org and I no longer have use for them. Does anyone want them who will use them for something having to do with bsd and clustering? Michael Grant From jules.stocks at gmail.com Fri Jun 5 12:34:11 2009 From: jules.stocks at gmail.com (Jules Gilbert) Date: Fri Jun 5 12:34:18 2009 Subject: bsdcluster.com/org In-Reply-To: <62b856460906050210q608b6d16n8cb4aadbf4ab4871@mail.gmail.com> References: <62b856460906050210q608b6d16n8cb4aadbf4ab4871@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <28d0cced0906050501n38168848n5902e74353cbbac1@mail.gmail.com> I'm just a user, not a developer and I have no use for the URL's. But I would like to mention that no one makes a distribution intended for a cluster machine. All the distributions that I know about are intended for fairly general purpose set of uses; For example, no machine operating within a cluster of machines should be loaded with compiler tools; Such tasks, such as compiling source code should happen prior to loading code on a cluster. Also, cluster-based machines usually need certain resources that, so far as I know, are not pre-built into the current distributions. And though we tried, spending (over the course of a year,) a couple of months on the problem, we were never able to make cluster-it work on FreeBSD. Most of the code works just fine, but not the critical task/job control features. Cluster machines are intended for production, not development. Lot's of similar characterizations can be made, but no one, at least so far as I know, makes a distribution, either for Linux or FreeBSD, that is appropriate for cluster community service. On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Michael Grant wrote: > I have the domain name bsdcluster.com and bsdcluster.org and I no > longer have use for them. ?Does anyone want them who will use them for > something having to do with bsd and clustering? > > Michael Grant > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From info at tennistips365.com Wed Jun 17 20:42:32 2009 From: info at tennistips365.com (365) Date: Wed Jun 17 20:42:40 2009 Subject: Reminder - Free Movie: Learn to play forehand in 48.23 seconds - Tennistips from Sweden Message-ID: <20090617204232.317788FC12@mx1.freebsd.org> Welcome to www.tennistips365.com Have a tour on the site and if you have any questions you are more than welcome to send me an e-mail. Free Movie: Learn to play forehand in 48.23 seconds. (During next week we start exclusive newsletter with technical and biomechanical tips.) Regards, Fredrik Lindstrom Manager www.tennistips365.com info@tennistips365.com --------------------------------------- Karlavagen 12 114 30 Stockholm SWEDEN --------------------------------------- From fjwcash at gmail.com Wed Jun 24 23:05:55 2009 From: fjwcash at gmail.com (Freddie Cash) Date: Wed Jun 24 23:06:01 2009 Subject: Fail-over SAN setup: ZFS, NFS, and ...? Message-ID: [Not exactly sure which ML this belongs on, as it's related to both clustering and filesystems. If there's a better spot, let me know and I'll update the CC:/reply-to.] We're in the planning stages for building a multi-site, fail-over SAN setup which will be used to provide redundant storage for a virtual machine setup. The setup will be like so: [Server Room 1] . [Server Room 2] ----------------- . ------------------- . [storage server] . [storage server] | . | | . | [storage switch] . [storage switch] \----fibre----/ | . | . | . [storage aggregator] . | . | . /---[switch]---\ . | | | . | [VM box] | . | | | . [VM box] | | . | | [VM box] . | | | . [network switch] . | . | . [internet] Server room 1 and server room 2 are on opposite ends of town (about 3 km) with a dedicated, direct-link, fibre link between them. There will be a set of VM boxes at each site, that use the shared storage, and will act as fail-over for each other. In theory, only 1 server room would ever be active at a time, although we may end up migrating VMs between the two sites for maintenance purposes. We've got the storage server side of things figured out (5U rackmounts with 24 drive bauys, using FreeBSD 7.x and ZFS). We've got the storage switches picked out (HP Procurve 2800 or 2900, depending on if we go with 1 GbE or 10 GbE fibre links between them). We're stuck on the storage aggregator. For a single aggregator box setup, we'd use FreeBSD 7.x with ZFS. The storage servers would each export a single zvol using iSCSI. The storage aggregator would use ZFS to create a pool using a mirrored vdev. To expand the pool, we put in two more storage servers, and add another mirrored vdev to the pool. No biggie. The storage aggregator then uses NFS and/or iSCSI to make storage available to the VM boxes. This is the easy part. However, we'd like to remove the single-point-of-failure that the storage aggregator represents, and have a duplicate of it running at Server Room 1. Right now, we can do this using cold-spares that rsync from the live box every X hours/days. We'd like this to be a live, fail-over spare, though. And this is where we're stuck. What can we use to do this? CARP? Heatbeat? ggate? Should we look at Linux with DRBD or linux-ha or cluster-nfs or similar? Perhaps RedHat Cluster Suite? (We'd prefer not to, as then storage management becomes a nightmare again, requiring mdadm, lvm, and more.) Would a cluster filessytem be needed? AFS or similar? We have next to no knowledge of fail-over clustering when it comes to high-availability and fail-over. Any pointers to things to read online, or tips, or even "don't do that, you're insane" comments greatly appreciated. :) Thanks. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From efinleywork at efinley.com Thu Jun 25 00:04:12 2009 From: efinleywork at efinley.com (Elliot Finley) Date: Thu Jun 25 00:04:19 2009 Subject: Fail-over SAN setup: ZFS, NFS, and ...? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A42B3C7.9000500@efinley.com> Why not take a look at gluster? Freddie Cash wrote: > [Not exactly sure which ML this belongs on, as it's related to both > clustering and filesystems. If there's a better spot, let me know and I'll > update the CC:/reply-to.] > > We're in the planning stages for building a multi-site, fail-over SAN setup > which will be used to provide redundant storage for a virtual machine setup. > The setup will be like so: > [Server Room 1] . [Server Room 2] > ----------------- . ------------------- > . > [storage server] . [storage server] > | . | > | . | > [storage switch] . [storage switch] > \----fibre----/ | > . | > . | > . [storage aggregator] > . | > . | > . /---[switch]---\ > . | | | > . | [VM box] | > . | | | > . [VM box] | | > . | | [VM box] > . | | | > . [network switch] > . | > . | > . [internet] > > Server room 1 and server room 2 are on opposite ends of town (about 3 km) > with a dedicated, direct-link, fibre link between them. There will be a set > of VM boxes at each site, that use the shared storage, and will act as > fail-over for each other. In theory, only 1 server room would ever be > active at a time, although we may end up migrating VMs between the two sites > for maintenance purposes. > > We've got the storage server side of things figured out (5U rackmounts with > 24 drive bauys, using FreeBSD 7.x and ZFS). We've got the storage switches > picked out (HP Procurve 2800 or 2900, depending on if we go with 1 GbE or 10 > GbE fibre links between them). We're stuck on the storage aggregator. > > For a single aggregator box setup, we'd use FreeBSD 7.x with ZFS. The > storage servers would each export a single zvol using iSCSI. The storage > aggregator would use ZFS to create a pool using a mirrored vdev. To expand > the pool, we put in two more storage servers, and add another mirrored vdev > to the pool. No biggie. The storage aggregator then uses NFS and/or iSCSI > to make storage available to the VM boxes. This is the easy part. > > However, we'd like to remove the single-point-of-failure that the storage > aggregator represents, and have a duplicate of it running at Server Room 1. > Right now, we can do this using cold-spares that rsync from the live box > every X hours/days. We'd like this to be a live, fail-over spare, though. > And this is where we're stuck. > > What can we use to do this? CARP? Heatbeat? ggate? Should we look at > Linux with DRBD or linux-ha or cluster-nfs or similar? Perhaps RedHat > Cluster Suite? (We'd prefer not to, as then storage management becomes a > nightmare again, requiring mdadm, lvm, and more.) Would a cluster > filessytem be needed? AFS or similar? > > We have next to no knowledge of fail-over clustering when it comes to > high-availability and fail-over. Any pointers to things to read online, or > tips, or even "don't do that, you're insane" comments greatly appreciated. > :) From mandrei05 at gmail.com Thu Jun 25 13:26:28 2009 From: mandrei05 at gmail.com (Andrei Manescu) Date: Thu Jun 25 13:26:35 2009 Subject: freebsd-cluster Digest, Vol 124, Issue 1 In-Reply-To: <20090625120014.57F0110656CE@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20090625120014.57F0110656CE@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: Any docs on gcluster ??? 2009/6/25 > Send freebsd-cluster mailing list submissions to > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-cluster-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-cluster-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-cluster digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Fail-over SAN setup: ZFS, NFS, and ...? (Freddie Cash) > 2. Re: Fail-over SAN setup: ZFS, NFS, and ...? (Elliot Finley) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:35:25 -0700 > From: Freddie Cash > Subject: Fail-over SAN setup: ZFS, NFS, and ...? > To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > [Not exactly sure which ML this belongs on, as it's related to both > clustering and filesystems. If there's a better spot, let me know and I'll > update the CC:/reply-to.] > > We're in the planning stages for building a multi-site, fail-over SAN setup > which will be used to provide redundant storage for a virtual machine > setup. > The setup will be like so: > [Server Room 1] . [Server Room 2] > ----------------- . ------------------- > . > [storage server] . [storage server] > | . | > | . | > [storage switch] . [storage switch] > \----fibre----/ | > . | > . | > . [storage aggregator] > . | > . | > . /---[switch]---\ > . | | | > . | [VM box] | > . | | | > . [VM box] | | > . | | [VM box] > . | | | > . [network switch] > . | > . | > . [internet] > > Server room 1 and server room 2 are on opposite ends of town (about 3 km) > with a dedicated, direct-link, fibre link between them. There will be a > set > of VM boxes at each site, that use the shared storage, and will act as > fail-over for each other. In theory, only 1 server room would ever be > active at a time, although we may end up migrating VMs between the two > sites > for maintenance purposes. > > We've got the storage server side of things figured out (5U rackmounts with > 24 drive bauys, using FreeBSD 7.x and ZFS). We've got the storage switches > picked out (HP Procurve 2800 or 2900, depending on if we go with 1 GbE or > 10 > GbE fibre links between them). We're stuck on the storage aggregator. > > For a single aggregator box setup, we'd use FreeBSD 7.x with ZFS. The > storage servers would each export a single zvol using iSCSI. The storage > aggregator would use ZFS to create a pool using a mirrored vdev. To expand > the pool, we put in two more storage servers, and add another mirrored vdev > to the pool. No biggie. The storage aggregator then uses NFS and/or iSCSI > to make storage available to the VM boxes. This is the easy part. > > However, we'd like to remove the single-point-of-failure that the storage > aggregator represents, and have a duplicate of it running at Server Room 1. > Right now, we can do this using cold-spares that rsync from the live box > every X hours/days. We'd like this to be a live, fail-over spare, though. > And this is where we're stuck. > > What can we use to do this? CARP? Heatbeat? ggate? Should we look at > Linux with DRBD or linux-ha or cluster-nfs or similar? Perhaps RedHat > Cluster Suite? (We'd prefer not to, as then storage management becomes a > nightmare again, requiring mdadm, lvm, and more.) Would a cluster > filessytem be needed? AFS or similar? > > We have next to no knowledge of fail-over clustering when it comes to > high-availability and fail-over. Any pointers to things to read online, or > tips, or even "don't do that, you're insane" comments greatly appreciated. > :) > > Thanks. > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:16:23 -0600 > From: Elliot Finley > Subject: Re: Fail-over SAN setup: ZFS, NFS, and ...? > To: Freddie Cash > Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4A42B3C7.9000500@efinley.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Why not take a look at gluster? > > Freddie Cash wrote: > > [Not exactly sure which ML this belongs on, as it's related to both > > clustering and filesystems. If there's a better spot, let me know and > I'll > > update the CC:/reply-to.] > > > > We're in the planning stages for building a multi-site, fail-over SAN > setup > > which will be used to provide redundant storage for a virtual machine > setup. > > The setup will be like so: > > [Server Room 1] . [Server Room 2] > > ----------------- . ------------------- > > . > > [storage server] . [storage server] > > | . | > > | . | > > [storage switch] . [storage switch] > > \----fibre----/ | > > . | > > . | > > . [storage aggregator] > > . | > > . | > > . /---[switch]---\ > > . | | | > > . | [VM box] | > > . | | | > > . [VM box] | | > > . | | [VM box] > > . | | | > > . [network switch] > > . | > > . | > > . [internet] > > > > Server room 1 and server room 2 are on opposite ends of town (about 3 km) > > with a dedicated, direct-link, fibre link between them. There will be a > set > > of VM boxes at each site, that use the shared storage, and will act as > > fail-over for each other. In theory, only 1 server room would ever be > > active at a time, although we may end up migrating VMs between the two > sites > > for maintenance purposes. > > > > We've got the storage server side of things figured out (5U rackmounts > with > > 24 drive bauys, using FreeBSD 7.x and ZFS). We've got the storage > switches > > picked out (HP Procurve 2800 or 2900, depending on if we go with 1 GbE or > 10 > > GbE fibre links between them). We're stuck on the storage aggregator. > > > > For a single aggregator box setup, we'd use FreeBSD 7.x with ZFS. The > > storage servers would each export a single zvol using iSCSI. The storage > > aggregator would use ZFS to create a pool using a mirrored vdev. To > expand > > the pool, we put in two more storage servers, and add another mirrored > vdev > > to the pool. No biggie. The storage aggregator then uses NFS and/or > iSCSI > > to make storage available to the VM boxes. This is the easy part. > > > > However, we'd like to remove the single-point-of-failure that the storage > > aggregator represents, and have a duplicate of it running at Server Room > 1. > > Right now, we can do this using cold-spares that rsync from the live box > > every X hours/days. We'd like this to be a live, fail-over spare, > though. > > And this is where we're stuck. > > > > What can we use to do this? CARP? Heatbeat? ggate? Should we look at > > Linux with DRBD or linux-ha or cluster-nfs or similar? Perhaps RedHat > > Cluster Suite? (We'd prefer not to, as then storage management becomes a > > nightmare again, requiring mdadm, lvm, and more.) Would a cluster > > filessytem be needed? AFS or similar? > > > > We have next to no knowledge of fail-over clustering when it comes to > > high-availability and fail-over. Any pointers to things to read online, > or > > tips, or even "don't do that, you're insane" comments greatly > appreciated. > > :) > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > End of freebsd-cluster Digest, Vol 124, Issue 1 > *********************************************** > From niteshbharti123 at gmail.com Mon Jun 29 15:08:16 2009 From: niteshbharti123 at gmail.com (Nitesh. Bharti) Date: Mon Jun 29 15:08:23 2009 Subject: AstroWix Solutions Message-ID: <4a48af8a.1a36720a.143f.6ee2@mx.google.com> AstroWix is a forward thinking Program and Project Management Solutions Company. With its strong adherence to Project Management norms, AstroWix facilitates organizations to excel in their respective business domains by achieving their desired organizational goals at the right time and at minimum budget. Our services range from helping organizations select the right projects, programs and portfolios to effectively drive business value and achieve sustainable competitive advantage. For the balanced and effective execution of these solutions, we blend a series of services which include Project Management Consulting, Project Management Competency Development, Setup and Support of Project Management Office, Collaboration and SharePoint Deployment and End-to-End Project Management Support. As a registered Education Provider of PMI, AstroWix is a leading provider for Project Management Training in helping professionals with their PMPR Certification India . PMP certification preparation involves rigorous training but our PMP training program ensures every PMP aspirant a comprehensive, quality and up to date training. For PMPR Certification India, AstroWix is a very popular choice for PMP professionals and PMP aspirants, providing training and end-to-end support for professionals to prepare for PMPR Certification examination. To know more about Project Management Training , PMP R Certification India Visit : www.astrowix.com Nitesh Ranjan AstroWix Project Solutions Pvt Ltd