SV: ***SPAM*** HA cluster

[Andy Sporner]

hi,

If you think this would help, yes.  But I have come to the 
conclusion that this is in fact pointless.  I got one reply
after my first post that said:

"Good idea.." 

to remove my software.  So be it!  I don't need the kind of
BULLSH*T that such people offer.  

As to contributing to the community--if there actually was one
I can put faith in it, but since there seems not to be and
this is not the first time I have had to write such language,
I don't believe.

Sad too, because I had a release that is nearing completion that
some people on this list have already been playing with that 
would have encompassed all of the needs as this other offering
would have done.

So let this be a lesson.  I will put my efforts towards a 
commercial offering (this includes FREP and later filesystem
triggers stuff) where I can be assured satisfaction by the
money I will make rather than the lack of respect so far that
I have recieved for all the efforts.

Have fun with what you have now....

Regards



Andy





--- "Lasse L. Johnsen" <lasse at freebsdcluster.org> wrote:
> Andy, Andy, Andy.....
> 
> May I put a link at www.freebsdcluster.[org|net|com] to your site?
> 
> Perhaps this will increase awareness?
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards, 
>         Lasse L. Johnsen 
>         FreeBSDCluster.org - an International Community 
> 
>         */ PGP-key available upon request /*
> 
> Quoting Andy Sporner <asporner at yahoo.com>:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have said this many times here.  I have such software
> > available and this has been available for some time in
> > this forum.  I wish people would just read the past posts
> > about this and support projects that were grounded in
> > the FREEBSD world.
> > 
> > I think at this point I will just remove my software
> > from general distribution if this is going to be the
> > way that support is going to be given...
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > 
> > Andrew Sporner
> > author bsd clustering initiative since 1997
> > http://www.sporner.com/freebsdclusters
> > 
> > 
> > --- Michael <michael at nettmail.de> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > if turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw seems down try:
> > > 
> > > http://www.freebsd.org.hk/html/sgcluster/
> > > 
> > > cul
> > > michael
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > look at sgcluster, i think this is the right thing for you:
> > > 
> > > http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/
> > > 
> > > cul
> > > 
> > > michael
> > > 
> > > Matt Douhan wrote:
> > > 
> > > >-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > >Fran: owner-freebsd-cluster at freebsd.org
> > > >Hi there
> > > >can you suggest a good HA solution based on freeBSD servers, like the
> > > >following.
> > > >Load balancing TCP+UDP on virtual ip + failover on the routers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                       ( net )
> > > >
> > > >                          |
> > > >                          |
> > > >                          |
> > > >                      ----------
> > > >                     |  switch  |
> > > >                      ----------
> > > >                      /        \
> > > >                     /          \
> > > >             ----------      ---------- failover
> > > >            |  active          backup
> > > >               router  |    |  router  |
> > > >             ----------      ----------
> > > >       load-balance \          /
> > > >                     \   VIP  /
> > > >                     ----------
> > > >                    |  switch  |
> > > >                     ----------
> > > >                      /      \
> > > >                     /        \
> > > >              ----------     ----------
> > > >             | server1  |   | server2  |
> > > >              ----------     ----------
> > > >                     real servers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >This solution make no real sense, why have HA servers when you do not
> > have
> > > >HA switches?, you are likely to set yourself up for disappointment is
> > all,
> > > >use seperate switches as well in order to get a real HA solution.
> > > >
> > > >Also in order to give more accurate answer we would need to know what
> > > >applications/services you will be providing, there is a huge difference
> > > >between all TCP and only wanting HTTP/HTTPS failover and so on.
> > > >
> > > >regards
> > > >
> > > >Matt
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >freebsd-cluster at freebsd.org mailing list
> > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
> > > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > freebsd-cluster at freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > > "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"ebsd-cluster
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	
> > 		
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> > http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-cluster at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> > 
> 
> 
> 



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/