"injunction" on the use of GA

[Genghis Khan]

On Mon, 27 May 2013 18:03:05 +0200
dt71 at gmx.com wrote:

> On 05/24/2013 01:04, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > If you don't want to participate in GA, you can block the related
> > javascript quite easily.
> 
> Irrelevant. Most users have no idea how to practically avoid GA, or
> even worse: they do not understand the dangers in enriching a
> terrorist company with lots of user-behavioral data.

RIGHT ON!!! I love this statement!

For the record, I send my emails to others and to mailing lists through
Tor Proxy, to hide my IP from google, unless I know that the other end
is using an email that is not connected with gmail server (by the way,
the same applies to at&t, msn, yahoo, cox and the rest of email servers
of the biggest internet providers of us and uk, but I do it especially
because of google).

> I would not be concerned about leaking my behavioral data, if that
> was the only thing that Google could get at, but that is not the
> case. Google uses <insert_random_person_here>'s data against
> <insert_another_random_person_here>, and that is made more and more
> possible with each case of a website using GA.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-chat at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To
> unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


-- 
Proper English www.reddit.com/r/proper
4 teh lulz... http://email.is-not-s.ms