SlackWareWolf at comcast.net
Sun Sep 25 03:22:26 UTC 2011
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:47:38 -0600
Brett Glass <brett at lariat.net> wrote:
> Indeed it was. Back in those days, they didn't jump a major version
> number every three or four releases. They polished and polished and
> POLISHED each version of the OS. The 4.x branch reached
> 4.11-RELEASE before it was shut down, and 5.x was nowhere near as
> good. Wish they'd pick a branch (8-STABLE or 9-STABLE) and do this again.
I remember those times too. In fact I still have my 4.0 - 4.11 CDs in my BSD binder. I too Hope that they go back to those Ultra-Stable super OSs. At least that's the way I think of it; a Super OS; That's exactly what I think of when I think of FreeBSD 4.0.
More information about the freebsd-chat