From lab at gta.com Tue Feb 3 07:12:47 2009 From: lab at gta.com (Larry Baird) Date: Tue Feb 3 07:12:53 2009 Subject: UTF as Filename Extension In-Reply-To: <10911.2654.10281@localhost> Message-ID: <20090203151245.60447.qmail@mailgate.gta.com> In article <10911.2654.10281@localhost> you wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:43:01 -0800, "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > > Here is a simple discussion that is probably more complex than I'd like > > it to be. Is there any way to enforce a UTF-8 encoding of a file, > > perhaps by filename extension? Could such an encoding solve cross > > platform line break incompatibility? > > I find that Emacs makes a very good job of 'hiding' these annoying > details from me. In both X11 and `no window' sessions of the editor, > the coding-system auto-detection of new buffers works 99% of the time > and I can specify it manually when it doesn't. > > Using the filename for automated guesses of what the content may be is > probably not going to work so well. Windows has tried doing it, and see > all the ATTACHMENT.JPG.EXE trojans they got as a result :) I have had luck using vim and setting the following in my environment. LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 I have also put utf-8 bomb characters at the beginning of my text files. Take a look at: http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Working_with_Unicode -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Larry Baird | http://www.gta.com Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL Email: lab@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080 From showroom at ymctoys.com Tue Feb 10 15:36:34 2009 From: showroom at ymctoys.com (YMCtoys.com - Showroom) Date: Tue Feb 10 15:36:40 2009 Subject: Confirm your subscription to YMCtoys.com Message-ID: <40a76da9589b105065d60180d0d10e79@localhost.localdomain> [index.cfm] You have been invited to join YMCtoys.com's email list(s). Click the link(s) to confirm your subscription: Welcome to [http://www.ymctoys.com] YMC! Confirm to list: YMCtoys.com - Google http://app.icontact.com/icp/confirm.php?r=1015215288&s=UQAV&gid=9857712&c=395994&l=34576&m=1550288 This message was sent by: YMCtoys.com, 1701 E 7th St., Los Angeles, Ca 90021 Powered by iContact: http://freetrial.icontact.com From freebsd-questions-local at be-well.ilk.org Tue Feb 10 17:52:54 2009 From: freebsd-questions-local at be-well.ilk.org (Lowell Gilbert) Date: Tue Feb 10 17:53:01 2009 Subject: please remove all search results with name Constantin Stalzer In-Reply-To: <338cd6e40902101716r302dd8dbuf45caad13c8c0a89@mail.gmail.com> (michael copeland's message of "Tue\, 10 Feb 2009 20\:16\:35 -0500") References: <1115427411@web.de> <20090210233640.GA70071@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20090211004106.GA70295@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <338cd6e40902101716r302dd8dbuf45caad13c8c0a89@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44ljsdzrv6.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> michael copeland writes: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Chris Knight wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote: >> > >> > To make fun of someone's ignorance is not humorous. >> > It is offensive and small. >> >> We are going to have to agree to disagree. It is my opinion that to >> make fun of someone's _stupidity_ is offensive. Stupidity, like the >> lack of a sense of humor, is a disability that can not be cured. >> Ignorance, which is easily cured, is something that we all suffer from >> time to time and is therefore a more universal point of humor. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > and if someone is ignorant of their stupidity? Objection, your honor: hypothetical implying fact not in evidence! -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From des at des.no Tue Feb 17 05:50:23 2009 From: des at des.no (=?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) Date: Tue Feb 17 05:50:30 2009 Subject: Test coverage analysis Message-ID: <86bpt1chp4.fsf@ds4.des.no> Does anybody here have any experience with test coverage analysis tools that support C and C++ on at least one of Solaris / Linux / FreeBSD? I've looked at Dynamic Memory Solutions (http://www.dynamic-memory.com/) and Testwell (http://www.testwell.fi/), but I haven't tried them, and I'm sure there are others I don't know about. TIA! DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des@des.no From thierry at FreeBSD.org Tue Feb 17 11:17:56 2009 From: thierry at FreeBSD.org (Thierry Thomas) Date: Tue Feb 17 11:18:03 2009 Subject: Test coverage analysis In-Reply-To: <86bpt1chp4.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86bpt1chp4.fsf@ds4.des.no> Message-ID: <20090217183042.GT86325@graf.pompo.net> Hello, Le Mar 17 f?v 09 ? 14:32:23 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav ?crivait?: > Does anybody here have any experience with test coverage analysis tools > that support C and C++ on at least one of Solaris / Linux / FreeBSD? > I've looked at Dynamic Memory Solutions (http://www.dynamic-memory.com/) > and Testwell (http://www.testwell.fi/), but I haven't tried them, and > I'm sure there are others I don't know about. TIA! No such experience yet, but I have plans to investigate gcc with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage and then gcov (1): Or maybe bcov . Good luck! -- Th. Thomas. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/attachments/20090217/278fb329/attachment.pgp From ken at stox.org Thu Feb 19 20:55:52 2009 From: ken at stox.org (Kenneth P. Stox) Date: Thu Feb 19 20:55:58 2009 Subject: Flourish 2009 Registration Now Open Message-ID: <1235104149.9778.78.camel@stox.dyndns.org> If you're not familiar with the conference, have a look at the webpage, this will be the 3rd year running with hopefully many more to come. It's a FLOSS (Free Libre Open Source Software) conference completely organized, and run by a student body. FLOURISH 2009 BRINGS TOGETHER OPEN-SOURCE EXPERTS FROM AROUND CHICAGO, THE MIDWEST, AND AROUND THE WORLD WHAT Flourish 2009 Flourish is an annual conference dedicated to bringing together experts and enthusiasts in Free, Libre, Open Source Software (FLOSS). Attendees of Flourish have an opportunity to see how using, creating and supporting FLOSS can enhance their careers, businesses and academic aspirations. Admission always free. WHO The University of Illinois at Chicago's ACM and IEEE chapters, with sponsorship from Motorola, Sun Microsystems, Orbitz, and others. WHY - Key open-source topics such as Google Android, Kubuntu, the Linux kernel, open mapping, user interfaces, music collaboration, and energy-efficient supercomputing. - Speakers like Ruby On Rails creator David Heinemeier Hansson, open-source law expert Daliah Sapers, and kernel hacker Christoph Lameter, - In-depth workshops on Erlang, Drupal, OpenSolaris, and Processing. WHEN April 3 - 4, 2009 9am - 5pm WHERE UIC Student Center East 750 South Halsted HOW Register at: http://www.flourishconf.com/register Follow updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/flourishconf/ From reed at reedmedia.net Fri Feb 20 07:56:15 2009 From: reed at reedmedia.net (Jeremy C. Reed) Date: Fri Feb 20 07:56:25 2009 Subject: PGP chain of trust tools Message-ID: I am looking for a way to count the "degrees of separation" or shortest path between public PGP keys. Any tools or libraries I should look at? I am researching to see if it would be useful for allowing mail (default deny stance / guilty-until-proven-innocent since most mail is unwanted) if the sender's signature is within 2 or 3 hops from recipient. Or scoring the mail up based on the lowest hops. Anyone know of anything like this? Any research? How far can this scale? (I now see a spamassassin plugin but doesn't score based on hops away.) Jeremy C. Reed From bmah at freebsd.org Fri Feb 20 22:45:38 2009 From: bmah at freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) Date: Fri Feb 20 22:45:45 2009 Subject: PGP chain of trust tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <499FA30B.2000206@freebsd.org> If memory serves me right, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > I am looking for a way to count the "degrees of separation" or shortest > path between public PGP keys. > > Any tools or libraries I should look at? Not sure how directly applicable this is, but it sounds like you want something like this: http://pgp.cs.uu.nl/ > I am researching to see if it would be useful for allowing mail (default > deny stance / guilty-until-proven-innocent since most mail is unwanted) if > the sender's signature is within 2 or 3 hops from recipient. Or scoring > the mail up based on the lowest hops. > > Anyone know of anything like this? Any research? How far can this scale? > > (I now see a spamassassin plugin but doesn't score based on hops away.) Interesting idea. For me personally, this probably would not work because the vast majority of people I correspond with don't PGP-sign their email (or, for that matter, even have PGP keys). Bruce. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 257 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/attachments/20090221/e60df189/signature.pgp