Copyright Issues

[Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.]

Paul Robinson wrote:

>On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:01:30AM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
>
>  
>
>>and on that note, did they continue that copyright infringment on the 
>>actual product? Cause my spidey sense is sensing that machine being sold 
>>out soon.  (come on, you're all thinking how much you want a daemon 
>>packaged condom on your workstation.  admit it.)
>>    
>>
>
>I've heard it called many, many things before but I think that's the
>first time I've heard somebody refer to it as a "workstation". Your
>partner is either very geeky, or very tolerant...
>
>Why do I get the feeling that we're now going to be bombarded with slang
>terms, pet names (we really, really, really don't want to do pet names
>by the way - I have no interest in knowing what various committers call
>their genitals), double and single entendres and this is all going to
>get very homoerotic and slightly uncomfortable to watch?
>  
>

ROFLMBU...as if geeks needed a whole new class of acronyms!
Suppose we can get some added to the "Jargon File"??

KDK