Stealthy?

[Vulpes Velox]

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:42:59 +0100
Paul Robinson <paul at iconoplex.co.uk> wrote:

> Apparently, we're part of, and using the products of a stealth
> project:
> 
> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3367381
> 
> Which inevitably led to one of Slashdot's amusing (sic) BSD
> articles:
> 
> http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/13/2241255&mode=nested&tid=122&tid=185&tid=190&threshold=-1
> 
> All I can say is, with 2.5 million hosted unique domain names, 4 out
> of 10 of the top hosting providers for stability and ~ 400 CVS bits
> set, this must be the worst example of stealth I've ever seen. From
> now on, I think core@ should be known as "The Bilderberg Group",
> hackers@ should be constrained to Freemasons and chat@ should
> concentrate on talking about how great Windows is to distract
> everybody else.

I liked on of the comments i read on /. "FreeBSD is a "stealthy" open
source project in the same way the Brooklyn Bridge [nyc.gov] is a
"stealthy" public works project"