Less messages to FreeBSD.org lists
colin.percival at wadham.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jan 26 10:57:15 PST 2004
At 18:50 26/01/2004, Lawrence Sica wrote:
>On Jan 26, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
> > Yes and no. Windows Update can behave badly. But I'm not talking
>>about Windows Update; I'm talking about FreeBSD Update, which is very
>>well behaved (and *much* faster, for that matter).
>Ever see the OS X Software Update? It works really well.
Is that the one which uses compressed cpio archives containing the
new versions of any updated files? I guess it's ok if you *want* to
waste bandwidth and your customers' time, but personally I like the
factor-of-50 reduction in bandwidth which FreeBSD Update accomplishes
by using binary diffs.
More information about the freebsd-chat