Ugly Huge BSD Monster
Brett Glass
brett at lariat.org
Wed Sep 3 11:11:39 PDT 2003
At 09:03 AM 9/3/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
>To get back to the original example: Qt? It's been entirely developed
>by Troll Tech, at certainly not "marginal" cost, and though they started
>off with a not-quite-free licence, they're doing fine with a
>GPL+commercial dual-licensing system now.
No, they're not "doing fine;" they're just not out of business yet.
>An older example, as I said, is ghostscript, whose cost isn't "marginal"
>either; but the comparison is not quite the same, since they released
>GPL versions a year after their commercial/AFPL versions. Nevertheless,
>it is a successful model using the GPL.
Wrong again. Deutsch hasn't gotten a Postscript consulting contract in
years.
>A third example is StarOffice. Many people are buying it from Sun
>rather than downloading OpenOffice, for support and additional features.
Another example of selling something else besides the software.
--Brett Glass
More information about the freebsd-chat
mailing list