DNS Question

[Brad Knowles]

At 5:20 PM +0200 2003/07/24, Nils Holland wrote:

>  Hmm, I don't know why this message turned up here again. Look at the date - I
>  posted it on Monday, it didn't seem to have gotten though, and I didn't
>  receive a failure notice, so I thought it lost and re-{wrote,sent} it
>  yesterday.

	Look at the "Received:" headers:

Received: from thunderbridge.de (thunderbridge.de [65.39.221.202])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2045243FB1
	for <freebsd-chat at freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 05:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nils at thunderbridge.de)
Received: (qmail 70295 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2003 15:25:27 -0000
Received: from dialin-pool2-220.wobline.de (HELO gaffa.thunderbridge.de)
	(postmaster at tisys.org@62.176.227.220)
	by thunderbridge.de with SMTP; 21 Jul 2003 15:25:27 -0000
Received: from gaffa.thunderbridge.de (gaffa.thunderbridge.de [192.168.0.1])
	by gaffa.thunderbridge.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C604AC
	for <freebsd-chat at freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:34:19 +0200 (CEST)


	Looks like it was held up on thunderbridge.de [65.39.221.202] for 
some reason (it comes into this machine on 21 Jul 2003 15:25:27 -0000 
and is sent to the next hop at 24 Jul 2003 05:59:04 -0700), but it's 
hard to tell just exactly why.  You'd need to look into the logs of 
this machine to see what the real problem was.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)