kern/172166: Deadlock in the networking code, possible due to a bug in the SCHED_ULE

Eugene Grosbein egrosbein at rdtc.ru
Tue Oct 2 07:50:11 UTC 2012


The following reply was made to PR kern/172166; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein at rdtc.ru>
To: Alexander Motin <mav at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, eugen at eg.sd.rdtc.ru,
        Andriy Gapon <avg at FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: kern/172166: Deadlock in the networking code, possible due to
 a bug in the SCHED_ULE
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:48:04 +0700

 02.10.2012 13:58, Alexander Motin ÐÉÛÅÔ:
 > About rw_lock priority propagation locking(9) tells:
 > The rw_lock locks have priority propagation like mutexes, but priority 
 > can be propagated only to an exclusive holder.  This limitation comes 
 > from the fact that shared owners are anonymous.
 > 
 > What's about idle stealing threshold, it was fixed in HEAD at r239194, 
 > but wasn't merged yet. It should be trivial to merge it.
 
 Would it fix my problem with 6-CPU box?
 Your commit log talks about "8 or more cores".
 
 Eugene Grosbein


More information about the freebsd-bugs mailing list