misc/116115: Bug in portaudit: it does not handle packagenames with ,

[Klavs Klavsen]

>Number:         116115
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       Bug in portaudit: it does not handle packagenames with ,
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Sep 05 10:20:01 GMT 2007
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Klavs Klavsen
>Release:        FreeBSD-6.2
>Organization:
EnableIT
>Environment:
FreeBSD tomcat5-ny.telmore.dk 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 11:05:30 UTC 2007     root at dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP  i386

>Description:
Hi guys,

I was just testing portaudit on FreeBSD 6.2.

I have mod_jk-1.2.19,1 installed.

a portaudit -Fda does not show it's vulnerable to anything.

However - it really is, and it's in the vulndb as well.

If I rename mod_jk-1.2.19,1 to mod_jk-1.2.19 a portaudit -Fda (or just -a)
says it's vulnerable.

So the conclusion is that portaudit's "version number" matching doesn't
seem to handle ,'s all that well.
>How-To-Repeat:
rename mod_jk to mod_jk-1.2.19,1 and see it NOT work. 
>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: