bin/86135: Fwd: Latent buffer overflow in getcwd

Andrey Chernov ache at FreeBSD.ORG
Wed Sep 14 21:40:17 PDT 2005


The following reply was made to PR kern/86135; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrey Chernov <ache at FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Bruce Evans <bde at zeta.org.au>
Cc: Trevor Blackwell <tlb at tlb.org>, freebsd-bugs at FreeBSD.ORG,
        FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/86135: Fwd: Latent buffer overflow in getcwd
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:35:53 +0400

 On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:27:03PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
 > MAXPATHLEN is not very relevant here -- the size needed is just the size of
 > our buffer, and MAXPATHLEN bytes is neither usually necessary nor always
 
 While it can be so for "up", it is not so for "ep", since it is
 filled by __getcwd() syscall and can't be bigger.
 
 Could you consider MAXPATHLEN for "ep" and 1024 for "up" variant?
 
 > - MAXPATHLEN is a misspelling of {PATH_MAX}.
 
 It is BSDsm. getwd(1) refers to MAXPATHLEN too.
 
 > - The magic 340 in the above was (1024 - 4) / strlen("../").  Now its
 >   magic is deeper.  340 was wrong even when the initial upsize was known
 >   to be (1024 - 4) since it didn't allow for the NUL terminator or mount
 >   points.  The exact is something like
 >   1 + (initial_upsize - {NAME_MAX} - 1) / strlen("../").
 
 Why ever this magic needed? It is only in comment, not in code.
 
 -- 
 http://ache.pp.ru/


More information about the freebsd-bugs mailing list