Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64?

Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 31 00:14:11 UTC 2021


On 2021-Mar-30, at 16:32, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 22:52 +0000, Dan Kotowski wrote:
>>> `guess SFP+ would need more special driver-attention ...
>>> from quick reading around the web I guess the DPAA2 also needs a
>>> closed source binary blob.
>> 
>> So this actually comes from NXP, not SolidRun. Linux already has
>> some/most of what's needed, and the license is GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-
>> Clause so there's hope, but I haven't heard a peep from NXP and
>> SolidRun doesn't really have the manpower to port to FreeBSD
>> themselves.
>> 
>> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/
> 
> That's actually very good news.  If it's dual-licensed it can be
> included in freebsd without any drama.  Still needs porting work, or
> maybe it could run using the linuxkpi stuff?
> 

The files there are a mix: a few list just:

# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
or:
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
or:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
or:
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */

( Kconfig Makefile dpaa2-ptp.[ch] dprtc-cmd.h dprtc.[ch] )

The others (most) list:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
or:
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */

The Copyrights seem to be Freescale Semiconductor Inc. and/or
NXP when documented on a file. May be they would be willing
to add the BSD-3-Clause where it is missing?

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)



More information about the freebsd-arm mailing list