RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] vs. to 0x1f0000 (size 0xbd90) [works]?

[Klaus Cucinauomo]

> Am 11.10.2020 um 22:21 schrieb Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com>:
> 
> It was about why something like "device_tree_address=0x4000" is
> needed when something like armstub8-gic.bin is in use.
> ....the naming conventions involved in finding armstub*.bin'sallow the file to be renamed in order to not be found,instead ofhaving to delete the file.


As also Rob proved in a previous post afaik,
The latest rpi-FW is bootable even if the complete device_tree_address -line is DELETED :-) Ha Ha 
or to say : outcommented, if you like that more…
K.