Raspberry Pi Camera: not tested, does that mean the device/code exists?

[The Lost Admin]

On May 26, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Milan Obuch <milan at obuch.sk> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:51:28 -0400
> The Lost Admin <thelostadmin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I noticed that the only thing on the Wiki page for the Pi that isn’t
>> “Ok” is the Pi Camera module. I’ve got a Pi (model 1) with a camera
>> module. How far along (if at all) is work on the camera interface
>> code?
>> 
>> Are there kernel modules/drivers? Are there appropriate /dev entries?
>> Is the raspistill and raspivid application code ported from Raspbian?
>> How bad is “not tested” on the wiki page?
>> 
>> I’m not afraid to compile things from source and do some testing but
>> I haven’t done any real programming in about 15 years. I might be
>> able to tweak a few lines of code in the applications if need be but
>> I’m pretty sure writing a kernel module or device driver is beyond my
>> current skills.
>> 
>> The Lost Admin
>> thelostadmin at gmail.com
>> 
> 
> Look into mail archives of this list, there is thread started by me
> with subject 'Raspberry Pi Videocore interfaces question - Raspberry
> Camera' from 16 Feb 2015. In a nutshell, it works, and there is quick
> baked port for userland program controlling the Pi camera.
> 
> Regards,
> Milan

Thanks for the quick response Milan. If I read the thread correctly, the Pi camera does in fact work and the example tools (raspistill and friends) have been ported successfully. Any idea what it would take to have whoever maintains the wiki page update it to indicate that the camera works?