11-armv6-GUMSTIX-snap build failure

Andrew Turner andrew at fubar.geek.nz
Fri Jun 26 13:39:23 UTC 2015


On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:31:56 +0000
Glen Barber <gjb at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:46:23AM +0100, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:41 +0000
> > Glen Barber <gjb at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > ----- Forwarded message from Glen Barber <gjb at FreeBSD.org> -----
> > > 
> > > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:58:32 GMT
> > > From: Glen Barber <gjb at FreeBSD.org>
> > > To: gjb at freebsd.org
> > > Subject: 11-armv6-GUMSTIX-snap build failure
> > > 
> > ... 
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> World build completed on Thu Jun 25 22:20:22 UTC 2015
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> Kernel build for GUMSTIX started on Thu Jun 25 22:20:22 UTC
> > > >>> 2015
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ===> GUMSTIX
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Kernel build directory is /usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/GUMSTIX
> > 
> > The GUMSTIX kernel config shouldn't be built as armv6. It should be
> > build with TARGET_ARCH=arm. This is the default if building with
> > just TARGET=arm specified.
> > 
> 
> How the scripts I'm using to build these work, I need to specify the
> TARGET_ARCH as well as TARGET.
> 
> So, this is not an issue if that is the correct fix, I'll just set
> both to 'arm.'  However, this has built successfully in the past with
> TARGET_ARCH=armv6 (and still does for stable/10).
> 
> Did something change between the branches in this regard?

Having looked at the release config file I thing there is some
confusion. the GUMSTIX kernel config is for an old series of boards.
These have been unavailable for the last 6 years [1].

The U-Boot target in the release config is for a newer board, the
DuoVero, however I'm not sure on the status of FreeBSD on this board.
It has the same SoC as the PandaBoard so should work, but I don't have
one to test.

Andrew

[1] http://docwiki.gumstix.org/index.php?title=Basix_and_connex
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/attachments/20150626/a9ca7d06/attachment.bin>


More information about the freebsd-arm mailing list