/usr/lib/private

[John Baldwin]

On Thursday, September 05, 2013 6:00:58 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:41:29AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to make it /private/usr/lib (or
> > /private/usr/lib/platform)? I could see us wanting a /private/usr/include
> > in the future for e.g. LLVM/Clang headers that things in base (e.g.
> > lldb) might use but whose stability we don't want to be responsible for.
> > 
> The libraries (and headers) are not needed in the single-user mode, and
> we are still trying to maintain the / and /usr split.

Would /usr/private/lib work without requiring rtld changes?  Looks like
it would not.  However, you could install a stock /etc/libmap32.conf 
that mapped /usr/lib/private or /usr/private/lib to the relevant 32-bit
path.

-- 
John Baldwin