Aliasing issue with TAILQ on ppc64 ?
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Sep 18 15:53:18 UTC 2012
In message <CAJ-FndCsf2Xsn=1ioHyr_tn3-yAFOE7E9-wrjp4rcQJajhZvpg at mail.gmail.com>
, Attilio Rao writes:
>The only way I can see this
>code is safe is, infact, to lock it with proper locks around the
>operations.
This is not about locking: at the time where this croaks there is
only one thread.
The problem is that:
// Empty, freshly initialized ban_head
b = valid_ban_object();
TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&ban_head, b, list);
be = TAILQ_LAST(&ban_head, banhead_s);
Causes a sig#11 in TAILQ_LAST().
I belive it is a NULL dereference, and I belive it happens
because the compiler overoptimizes TAILQ_{LAST|PREV}()
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list