On 2012/3/25 4:00, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi, > > As SIGSERVICE is de-facto reserved by librt, shouldn't it be defined (or at > least listed as such) in<sys/signal.h>, just like SIGTHR/SIGLWP ? > > See attached patch. > Yes, but I think the signal name is too general, should it be SIGLIBRT or something else ?