[RFC] shipping kernels with default modules?

Kostik Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Sat Jun 11 11:14:14 UTC 2011


On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 05:21:20PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Has there been any further thought as of late about shipping kernels
> with modules only by default, rather than monolithic kernels?
> 
> I tried this experiment a couple years ago and besides a little
> trickery with ACPI module loading, it worked out fine.
> 
> Is there any reason we aren't doing this at the moment? Eg by having a
> default loader modules list populated from the kernel config file?
I use highly modularized kernel on all machines, because it allows me
to use (almost) the same kernel config.

Will you provide a prototype change for your suggestion ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20110611/418bad3a/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list