Importing the fusefs kernel module?
Ulrich Spörlein
uqs at spoerlein.net
Thu Oct 28 18:45:06 UTC 2010
On Thu, 28.10.2010 at 12:19:52 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2010/10/28 Gustau Pérez <gperez at entel.upc.edu>:
>
> > The point is, do we stick with fuse or do we switch to puffs ? What is
>
> Basically my vote goes to fuse for these reasons:
>
> * More file systems are developed for fuse
> * It's more popular both among the users and 3d party software
> developers (you mentioned Gnome)
> * It's better performing, at least in theory, because puffs was not
> originally written for a multi-threaded kernel (lots of serialization)
I was under the impression, there's a library for puffs (called
re-fuse?!?) which would provide API compatible shims for FUSE, rendering
your first argument invalid.
Or am I wrong?
Uli
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list