Importing the fusefs kernel module?

Ulrich Spörlein uqs at spoerlein.net
Thu Oct 28 18:45:06 UTC 2010


On Thu, 28.10.2010 at 12:19:52 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2010/10/28 Gustau Pérez <gperez at entel.upc.edu>:
> 
> >   The point is, do we stick with fuse or do we switch to puffs ? What is
> 
> Basically my vote goes to fuse for these reasons:
> 
>  * More file systems are developed for fuse
>  * It's more popular both among the users and 3d party software
> developers (you mentioned Gnome)
>  * It's better performing, at least in theory, because puffs was not
> originally written for a multi-threaded kernel (lots of serialization)

I was under the impression, there's a library for puffs (called
re-fuse?!?) which would provide API compatible shims for FUSE, rendering
your first argument invalid.

Or am I wrong?

Uli


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list