Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang

[Doug Barton]

On 05/17/10 02:26, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> lib/clang/..., as it is done for bind ?
> 
> So I guess that would lead to the following directory structure?
> 
> - lib/clang/libclang.../
> - lib/clang/libllvm.../

Yes.

> - usr.bin/clang/clang/
> - usr.bin/clang/tblgen/

I don't think we have any hierarchies like this in the tree currently. I
would vote for just usr.bin/clang, usr.bin/tblgen, etc. How many
binaries are we talking about?

> Sounds fine by me, but then I'm still not sure where I should place the
> include/ directory, which contains an overlay of header files used by
> LLVM/Clang sources.

I agree with the previous poster that lib/clang/include sounds
reasonable. In any case, thanks for taking a look at this. :)


hth,

Doug

-- 

	... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
			-- Propellerheads

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/