spliting kernel ipfw source ? (also involves sctp)

Rui Paulo rpaulo at gmail.com
Sun Mar 1 16:41:38 PST 2009


On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:26, Julian Elischer wrote:

> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am planning to split netinet/ip_fw2.c in a number of smaller files
>> to make it more manageable, and while i do this I would also like
>> to move the files related to ipfw2 (namely ip_fw*c) to a better  
>> place.
>> Any objection to moving them to sys/netinet/ipfw2 ?
>> Also, I can't help noticing that sys/netinet/ contains 36 files
>> related to sctp -- wouldn't it be the case to move them
>> (perhaps with the exception of the userland headers)
>> to a separate subdirectory ?
>
> for that matter it would be nice to put ALL teh protocols in their  
> own subdirectories.

Yes, that would be the perfect scenario, but I don't think that's  
doable.

SCTP can be moved because it hasn't matured enough to cause a "moving  
nightmare".

I vote for "ipfw" like Sam, BTW.

--
Rui Paulo

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20090302/0279c871/PGP.pgp


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list