WIP: ATA to CAM integration

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2009-Jun-05 13:27:03 -0600, Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org> wrote:
>Every one of Matt's emails follow this formula:
>
>1. I don't know how FOO works, but how you're doing it is wrong
>2. Here's how I think FOO should work
>3. I'm going to work on FOO in DragonFlyBSD and have it done in a week.
>
>1 and 2 are ignorant and worthless in a technical conversation, and 3 is 
>off topic for FreeBSD mailing lists.  So yes, I'm calling him out.

Well, I have seen little evidence of 1.  2 _can_ be relevant in an
architectural discussion.  3 may or may not be relevant - it depends
whether FreeBSD can make use of the work or not.

I agree with Julian that you are being unnecessarily provocative.
IMHO, Matt has made a positive contribution to this thread.  Rather
than quoting him out of context, how about you take a chill pill and
consider what benefits FreeBSD can gain by reusing work done by other
free Unices.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20090606/5b20014f/attachment.pgp