RFC: New VOP to translate vnode to its component name

[Ed Schouten]

* Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 18:03 +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > Maybe this should be called VOP_COMPONENTNAME? I know, it's not as short
> > as VOP_CNP, but is probably less cryptic to people who are trying to
> > figure out how the VFS works.
> 
> I'm open to a new name, but VOP_COMPONENTNAME does seem a bit unwieldy.
> What about VOP_VPTONAME (in the same vein as VOP_VPTOFH)?

Sounds good. :-)

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed at 80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20081208/8169a502/attachment.pgp