Linux compatible setaffinity.
Robert Watson
rwatson at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 25 12:10:54 PST 2007
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> I have implemented a linux compatible sched_setaffinity() call which is
> somewhat crippled. This allows a userspace process to supply a bitmask of
> processors which it will run on. I have copied the linux interface such
> that it should be api compatible because I believe it is a sensible
> interface and they beat us to it by 3 years.
BTW, I notice that you declare sched_getaffinity() in the user include file,
but don't reserve a system call in syscalls.master or implement it. Is this
intentional?
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list