New "timeout" api, to replace callout
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sun Dec 2 08:15:25 PST 2007
In message <20071202.085545.177225588.imp at bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>There are a number of places in the tree that use a parameter of '1'
>today to mean "next time that's convenient." Some of these places are
>clever and know that HZ is never < 100 or > 1000 (or so they think),
>while others are just sloppy code.
Yes, but those can hardly be called "concrete" in terms of wanting
to know what they mean, can they ? :-)
The only way I can see we can deal with them in the short term,
is to ask for timeouts of "1000000 / hz, TIMEOUT_USEC"
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list