Lockless uidinfo.

John Baldwin jhb at freebsd.org
Tue Aug 21 14:53:45 PDT 2007


On Tuesday 21 August 2007 03:19:02 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > Memory barriers on another CPU don't mean anything about the CPU thread 2 
is 
> > on.  Memory barriers do not flush caches on other CPUs, etc.  Normally 
when 
> > objects are refcounted in a table, the table holds a reference on the 
object, 
> > but that doesn't seem to be the case here. [...]
> 
> But the memory barrier from 'mtx_lock(&uihashtbl_mtx)' above
> 'if (uip->ui_ref > 0)' would do the trick and I can safely avoid using
> atomic read in this if statement, right?

Yes, though that may be rather non-obvious to other people, or to yourself 6 
months down the road.  You should probably document it.

> > [...] Have you tried doing something 
> > very simple in uifree():
> > 
> > {
> > 	mtx_lock(&uihashtbl_mtx);
> > 	if (refcount_release(...)) {
> > 		LIST_REMOVE();
> > 		mtx_unlock(&uihashtbl_mtx);
> > 		...
> > 		free();
> > 	} else
> > 		mtx_unlock(&uihashtbl_mtx);
> > }
> > 
> > I wouldn't use a more complex algo in uifree() unless the simple one is 
shown 
> > to perform badly.  Needless complexity is a hindrance to future 
maintenance.
> 
> Of coure we could do that, but I was trying really hard to remove
> contention in the common case. Before we used UIDINFO_LOCK() in the
> common case, now you suggesting using global lock here, and I'd really,
> really prefer using one atomic only.

*sigh*  You ignored my last sentence.  You need to think about other people 
who come and read this later or yourself 12 months from now when you've paged 
out all the uidinfo stuff from your head.

Hmm, what happens if you get this:

thread A
--------

 refcount_release() - drops to 0

  preempted

                                 thread B
                                 --------
                                 uihold() - refcount goes to 1
                                 ...
                                 uifree() - refcount goes to 0
                                 removes object from table and frees it

  resumes

  mtx_lock(&uihashtbl);

  sees refcount of 0 so tries to destroy object again

 *BOOM* (corruption, panic, etc.)

This is the race that the current code handles by taking a reference
on the uid while it drops the uidinfo lock to acquire the table lock.

Probably you need to not drop the last reference unless you hold the 
uihashtbl_mtx, which means not using refcount_release() and manually use an 
atomic_cmpset_int() if the refcount is > 1 to drop a ref to optimize the 
common case:

	old = uip->ui_refs;
	if (old > 1) {
		if (atomic_cmpset_int(&uip->ui_refs, old, old - 1))
			return;
	}

	mtx_lock(&uihashtbl_mtx);
	if (refcount_release(&uip->ui_refs)) {
		/* remove from table and free */
	}
	mtx_unlock(&uihashtbl_mtx);

-- 
John Baldwin


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list