Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base)

Ollivier Robert roberto at keltia.freenix.fr
Sat Mar 4 08:33:56 PST 2006


According to Divacky Roman:
> I think that Robert Ollivier strongly suggested using mercurial as our
> (possibly) next vcs, so if any move from cvs then to mercurial..

My paper talks about Mercurial as a potential successor to CVS yes but keep
in mind that moving from vcs is difficult and moving from a centralised one
to a distributed one is even more.

Now, I don't think subversion is the answer.  It has some better things
than CVS (which is not difficult in itself) but still lacks a fundamental
feature: when you merge from a branch, it has no memory that you did so and
when.  It is bad.
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto at keltia.freenix.fr
Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 7.9.0: Wed Mar 30 20:11:17 PST 2005


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list