Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base)

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Fri Mar 3 03:10:56 PST 2006


In message <84dead720603030303p122ea0efn892bf9ffd32fce41 at mail.gmail.com>, "Jose
ph Koshy" writes:
>phk> Considering how much stuff a change of vcs would affect, just think
>phk> about all the scripts and routines the committers have on their
>phk> development computers, a significantly better reason than "it is
>phk> prettier" is required.
>
>A 'distributed' VCS with good support for branching and merging would
>ease the work of our non-committer volunteers.

I'm sure that there are many sound arguments for switching to one
or the other vcs, but the crucial test is: are the arguments good
enough to make the disruption and hazzle worth it.

So far I have not heard anything which comes even close to meeting
that threshold...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list