SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds

Andrew R. Reiter arr at
Wed Jul 5 15:44:49 UTC 2006

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote:

:In message: <28872.1151526546 at>
:            "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk at> writes:
:: In message <20060628150227.R75801 at>, "Andrew R. Reiter" writes
:: :
:: >
:: >I apologize for top posting, but I lost the email that I think my 
:: >point/question pertains to.
:: >
:: >Part of this seems to be for compatibility / merging from drivers of other 
:: >OSes, no?  If I am wrong, ignore me :-).  If this is the case, would it be 
:: >better to create some common other area for things of this nature so that 
:: >it suffices to allow builds, but does not infect other areas of our own 
:: >code base?
:: That's what I proposed too:  #include <sys/netbsd_compat.h>
:This is even lamer.  It makes no sense to invent a stupid place for a
:compatibility define.  Might as well put the definition of NULL in
:I'm killing this idea because people hate it.

Please explain which "idea" you're killing ... because your post-July 4th 
attitude does not make it clear.



arr at

More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list