[CFR] Introduce "route del" as a synonym to "route delete"
ceri at submonkey.net
Fri Sep 23 07:16:25 PDT 2005
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:12:48PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:15PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:05:41PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:56:49PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > > > > Any objections?
> > > >
> > > > Any benefit? What's the rationale?
> > >
> > > Convenience.
> > I don't get it, though. I have FreeBSD, Solaris and Digital UNIX systems
> > here and none of them support "del". What does?
> eg Linux.
Aha. Well it isn't going to kill me either way, and if it does make
life easier that's fair enough, but the old bastard in me wants people to
read manuals before they go typing in administrative commands ;)
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20050923/ae13eabc/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-arch